The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled against a request to move a dispute over a fossil-fuel pipeline from state to federal court. The Enbridge Energy pipeline, known as Line 5, transports crude oil and natural gas liquid such as propane under the Great Lakes – between Sarnia, Ontario and Superior, Wisconsin.
It’s been operating since 1953. In 2019, Michigan Attorney Dana Nessel sued in state court, hoping to void an easement for the pipeline and ultimately shut it down.
The high court ruled unanimously Wednesday for Nessel in her argument that Enbridge waited too long to ask to move a lawsuit about twin pipelines running beneath the Straits of Mackinac to federal court from state court, according to the Detroit Free Press.
Enbridge’s attorneys argued that it would not harm the state to litigate in federal court, and Congress never intended to restrict federal courts when deciding the proper venue for such issues to be considered.
Trending
- Trump confirms calling Netanyahu ‘crazy’ for Israel attacks on Lebanon amid efforts to end Iran war
- NYC investigating groups entering, emerging from municipal sewers
- WATCH: Scott Bessent OBLITERATES Loathsome Democrat Senator During Hearing With a Devastating Question Regarding His Son’s Shady Background
- George Santos Under Investigation For Betting On Kalshi: Report
- EXCLUSIVE: House Freedom Caucus Demands FISA Reform Ahead Of Major Surveillance Vote
- Iran Fires Ballistic Missiles and Drones at Kuwait, Bahrain
- Maryland sheriffs say reckless sanctuary policies have left them ‘handcuffed’
- Black Crowes frontman slammed after shutting down ‘USA’ chant and calling fans ignorant