Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Trump admin announces additional $100M for school lunch programs
    • VP Vance visits Maine factory, touts ‘manufacturing renaissance’
    • Calif. GOP lawmakers push their Dem counterparts to consider affordability in last week of session
    • California Cancels Talks With Paramount Over Warner Bros Deal
    • Memory Chip Maker Micron Unveils Plans for $10 Billion Research Lab in Idaho
    • Supreme Court Lifts District Court Injunction Permitting Trump Administration to Move Forward on Postal Voting Plan
    • METAPHOR ALERT: Barack Obama Elementary School in Virginia Closed Indefinitely Due to Mold and Rodents (VIDEO)
    • Supreme Court hands Trump a win in bid to prevent ineligible voters voting in midterm elections
    • World News Vids
    • Whatfinger News
    • Donate
    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Subscribe
    Tuesday, August 25
    • Home
    • Whatfinger News
    • Breaking News 24/7
    • Rumble Fast Clips
    • Right Wing Vids
    • Daily News Link List
    • Military
    • Crazy Clips
    • Entertainment
    • Support Whatfinger
    • Donate To Whatfinger
    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Home»News»No, New York Times, We Don’t Need to Dam the Bering Strait ‘to Save the Climate’
    News

    No, New York Times, We Don’t Need to Dam the Bering Strait ‘to Save the Climate’

    Whatfinger EditorBy Whatfinger EditorMay 1, 2026No Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The New York Times (NYT) reports in “A New Idea to Save the Climate? Dam the Bering Strait.” that scientists have proposed building a 50-mile-long dam between Alaska and Russia to stabilize the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) in order to prevent climate catastrophe. This is a seriously risky idea. The proposal is not an engineering plan grounded in observational need, but rather is computer-model thought experiment based on speculative tipping-point scenarios not justified by data concerning the AMOC or an understanding of what the possible future consequences might be for humans, the oceans, and sea life.

    The author describes an article published in Science Advances where the idea of a cross continental dam across the Bering Strait is proposed as a “proof of concept,” noting that the dam could, under certain modeled conditions, prevent an AMOC collapse. It further explains that the findings come from a computer model of Earth’s climate, not from direct evidence that the AMOC is about to fail. That distinction is critical.


    Read Full Article: https://www.climatedepot.com/2026/05/01/no-new-york-times-we-dont-need-to-dam-the-bering-strait-to-save-the-climate/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=no-new-york-times-we-dont-need-to-dam-the-bering-strait-to-save-the-climate

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Whatfinger Editor

    Related Posts

    Trump admin announces additional $100M for school lunch programs

    August 24, 2026
    Read More

    Calif. GOP lawmakers push their Dem counterparts to consider affordability in last week of session

    August 24, 2026
    Read More

    VP Vance visits Maine factory, touts ‘manufacturing renaissance’

    August 24, 2026
    Read More
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    🛑Breaking News 24/7 📰Rumble Clips👍 Choice Clips🎞️CRAZY Clips😜 Right Wing Vids🔥Military⚔️Entertainment🍿Money💵Crypto🪙Sports🏈World🌍Sci-Tech🧠 ‘Mainstream 🗞️Twitter –X🐤Lifehacks🤔 Humor Feed 🤡 Humor Daily🤡 Live Longer❤️‍🩹 Anime😊  Food🍇 US Debt Clock 💳 Support Whatfinger💲

    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Whatfinger Quickhits is published by Whatfinger News

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.