Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Poll: Voters cite wide range of reasons for rise of socialist candidates
    • Everyday Economics: The Fed can pause. Americans still won’t get much relief
    • Poll: Majority rejects AI fraud detection if eligible people lose out
    • Treasury’s Do Not Pay covers 99% of programs. The law covers 11
    • Brooklyn woman arrested after alleged syringe attack on NYC rabbi and stabbing second Jewish man
    • 6 stellar images of the early universe
    • DEVELOPING: Ninth Circuit to Rule on DOJ’s Bid to Block 20,000 Illegal California Votes From Being Counted – Panel Reportedly Skeptical of DOJ
    • Why Western Civilization Is Fighting Back
    • World News Vids
    • Whatfinger News
    • Donate
    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Subscribe
    Sunday, October 25
    • Home
    • Whatfinger News
    • Breaking News 24/7
    • Rumble Fast Clips
    • Right Wing Vids
    • Daily News Link List
    • Military
    • Crazy Clips
    • Entertainment
    • Support Whatfinger
    • Donate To Whatfinger
    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Home»News»Department of Justice probes Connecticut towns over firearm waiting periods
    News

    Department of Justice probes Connecticut towns over firearm waiting periods

    Whatfinger EditorBy Whatfinger EditorOctober 23, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    (The Center Square) — The U.S. Justice Department is investigating two Connecticut cities over claims they are violating Second Amendment rights by delaying the issuance of firearm permits.The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division announced Thursday that it has opened an investigation into Middletown and Waterbury, Connecticut, “to determine whether they unnecessarily delay the issuance of firearm permits to their residents.” The investigation will focus on the Middletown and Waterbury police departments’ permitting systems, the DOJ said.
    “All law-abiding Americans have a constitutional right to bear arms for self‑defense,” Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division said in a statement. “This right is not a luxury reserved for a privileged few, but a fundamental liberty for all, including the residents of Middletown and Waterbury, Connecticut.”
    The Supreme Court’s 2022 seminal ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen recognized that the right to keep and bear arms applies with equal force inside and outside the home. In Bruen, the Supreme Court warned against “lengthy wait times in processing license applications” that effectively “deny ordinary citizens their right to public carry.”
    “The Middletown and Waterbury police departments may be unreasonably denying otherwise qualified applicants a CCW permit and forcing them to undergo a potentially years-long appeal process to exercise this fundamental right,” Dhillon said.
    There was no immediate comment from the local governments or state Attorney General William Tong, whose office would likely be defending the municipal governments from any resulting legal action.
    The federal investigation comes after a 2025 state audit found that the Connecticut Board of Firearms Permit Examiners, a nine-member board that considers appeals of firearm permit denials, had a backlog of 1,203 cases that was forcing applicants to wait months for hearings before the panel.
    Connecticut, which like many Northeast states has tough gun control laws, is also facing separate legal challenges over its 1994 “assault weapon” ban and a new law setting tough new restrictions on the open carry of firearms in public places.
    The state’s assault weapon ban was approved in 2013 in response to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings, when a lone gunman killed 20 children and six educators.
    Earlier this month, a federal judge temporarily blocked a Connecticut law banning the sale of handguns that can be turned into “virtual machine guns” through the addition of a device known as a Glock switch that increases the rate of fire.
    In that ruling, U.S. District Judge Kari Dooley wrote that the law is inconsistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation, and because of that was likely unconstitutional. She issued a preliminary injunction blocking the law from taking effect while the case plays out in court.


    Read Full Article: https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/department-justice-probes-connecticut-towns-over-firearm-waiting?utm_source=justthenews.com&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=external-news-aggregators

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Whatfinger Editor

    Related Posts

    Poll: Voters cite wide range of reasons for rise of socialist candidates

    October 25, 2026
    Read More

    Treasury’s Do Not Pay covers 99% of programs. The law covers 11

    October 25, 2026
    Read More

    Poll: Majority rejects AI fraud detection if eligible people lose out

    October 25, 2026
    Read More
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    🛑Breaking News 24/7 📰Rumble Clips👍 Choice Clips🎞️CRAZY Clips😜 Right Wing Vids🔥Military⚔️Entertainment🍿Money💵Crypto🪙Sports🏈World🌍Sci-Tech🧠 ‘Mainstream 🗞️Twitter –X🐤Lifehacks🤔 Humor Feed 🤡 Humor Daily🤡 Live Longer❤️‍🩹 Anime😊  Food🍇 US Debt Clock 💳 Support Whatfinger💲

    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Whatfinger Quickhits is published by Whatfinger News

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.