The Kharg Obsession: The Shot Washington Was Too Smart to Take in 1980
Kharg, once deemed in Washington too escalatory to contemplate, is now being sold as a neat, limited “solution” to the Iran problem…
Freddie Ponton via 21Wire
The most revealing part of the Kharg Island story is not the island’s strategic value, nor even that it hosts the most important complex of Christian archaeology in the Persian Gulf. It is that a target once deemed in Washington too escalatory to contemplate is now being sold as a neat, limited “solution” to the Iran problem. Kharg is Iran’s principal crude export terminal, and the Center for Strategic and International Studies CSIS and Reuters, citing JPMorgan, have both described it as handling nearly all or the overwhelming majority of Iranian oil exports, which is precisely why it has become the fixation of hawks who imagine that control over one island could break Iran’s war economy without dragging the United States into another regional trap.
DOCUMENT: The Christian Monastery On The Island Of Kharg – A study by John Bowman from the University of Melbourne [View Doc]>>> (Source GospelStudies)
The public rumour cycle appears to begin with March 7 reporting that the White House was considering some form of raid or seizure scenario involving Kharg, after which the idea spread rapidly through follow-on coverage in RFE/RL, ABC, and many other outlets. What those stories established was not a public operational order, a disclosed force package, or a presidential announcement, but the existence of a discussion, or at a minimum, a leak about a discussion, inside Trump-administration circles. That distinction is crucial because it means the evidence in public view is stronger for policy signalling than for a finalised decision.
The story spread so fast because it did not arrive in a vacuum. It landed in a media and policy environment already shaped by years of maximalist anti-Iran rhetoric, and by a class of commentators who had been working to normalise the idea that Iran’s economic lifelines should be physically seized if sanctions and sabotage failed to produce submission. AEI’s Michael Rubin argued openly that seizing Kharg would be “the ultimate checkmate to Iran,” while other commentary framed the island as tailor-made for a president who has long spoken in the language of taking adversaries’ oil rather than negotiating with them.
Read Full Article: https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/the-kharg-obsession-the-shot-washington-was-too-smart-to-take-in-1980/
