I have to admit that Trump’s behavior has expanded beyond what I expected from him. As most of my readers know, I have been quite skeptical of the president, always alluding to the fact that he has had a long, and well-documented by the way, friendship with Bill and Hillary Clinton. Never in my wildest dreams, however, would I have suspected that he would openly mock Jesus Christ the way he just has, or even be implicated in the Epstein mess. I have, however, always argued that he was put in place to persuade the conservative voter into acquiescence with the globalist agenda. In some ways, this has become indisputable for anyone being honest, as conservative voters have by and large, accepted many things from Trump that they wouldn’t from Biden, or Obama, that seem to push conservative attitudes unknowingly to the left. It is on one hand, humorous, and on the other, tragic, as over the years I have been viciously attacked as a milk toast patriot for offering up what I considered to be thoughtful, and well-written criticisms of Trump’s so-called, conservative positions. While many people seem to be awakening to the idea that they have been bamboozled, while having fun mocking Trump in the process, we are left with a daunting reality. As a movement, we have done nothing to build a viable conservative opponent that stands a chance of beating a Gavin Newsome-type candidate, or worse yet, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, or even Michelle Obama. Instead, conservatives were led down this dangerous idea of possibly accepting a third term from Trump under the “only he can save us” narrative that has trapped the minds of so many people. In any case, we are now facing the prospects of a leftist landslide in the midterms, and no conservative candidate that has a chance of winning in 2028. On that point, I digress. Many people have scoffed at me for pointing out the reality of Trump and Clinton being friends. However, it is something that should have never been ignored, as Hillary herself is a disciple of none other than the king of community organizing author of Rules for Radicals, Saul Alinsky.
What are the implications of that and why does it matter? Hillary Clinton knew Alinsky personally, and wrote her college thesis, “There is only the Fight,” based on his confrontational organizing style. The title of the paper itself speaks a great deal towards the ideas Alinsky represented as it implies there is nothing more important than the social change sought by Alinsky, and the radical left. Where Alinsky and Clinton differed were their beliefs whether this type of change could be achieved outside the system. Clinton, rejecting a job offer from Alinsky, believed that change could only happen by working within the government. A “cast aside my radical appearance and don a suit and tie approach,” if you will. Alinsky’s primary objective is the accumulation of power, and the ethics and morals, or lack thereof, involved. He believed that the organization of the lower strata of society was key in achieving the type of political power needed to gain true social equality among the masses, and any means were permissible towards those ends.
Read Full Article: https://thewashingtonstandard.com/means-ends-morality-corrupted-means-the-push-towards-utopia/
