Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Supreme Court approves Texas’s congressional map redraw
    • Fetterman urges Dems to fund WH ballroom after WHCD shooting
    • New Mexico Stops Abortion Reporting, Hides How Abortion Kills and Hurts Women
    • Texas Redistricting Upheld By US Supreme Court
    • What’s in Trump’s Record $1.5 Trillion Military Budget Request
    • When You Get What You Wanted… & Hate It
    • Terminally Ill Ben Sasse Reveals Dying Wish For America
    • Major fire erupts at UK base used for US bombers
    • World News Vids
    • Whatfinger News
    • Donate
    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Subscribe
    Monday, April 27
    • Home
    • Whatfinger News
    • Breaking News 24/7
    • Rumble Fast Clips
    • Right Wing Vids
    • Daily News Link List
    • Military
    • Crazy Clips
    • Entertainment
    • Support Whatfinger
    • Donate To Whatfinger
    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Home»News»Ohio Judge Challenges Radical Amendment That Allowed Abortion on Demand
    News

    Ohio Judge Challenges Radical Amendment That Allowed Abortion on Demand

    Whatfinger EditorBy Whatfinger EditorApril 15, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Yesterday, Trumbull County Probate Judge David Engler filed a lawsuit to stop Ohio’s abortion amendment because it has eliminated his ability as a juvenile judge to have jurisdiction over judicial bypass proceedings for underage girls to obtain an abortion without parental consent.

    Specifically, the new amendment created a conflict between Article I and Article IV of Ohio’s constitution. Article I was amended in 2023 to allow for abortions for any individual, yet Article IV states that probate judges have a duty to provide judicial bypass for individuals who are under 18 years old. Because Ohio’s voters were not told of this conflict in the ballot language before them when voting, the only way to resolve the discrepancy between these conflicting constitutional provisions is by asking the Ohio Supreme Court to halt enforcement of the amendment, create ballot language that clarifies the constitutional repercussions, and have voters clarify if that is their intent.


    Read Full Article: https://www.lifenews.com/2026/04/15/ohio-judge-challenges-radical-amendment-that-allowed-abortion-on-demand/

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Whatfinger Editor

    Related Posts

    Fetterman urges Dems to fund WH ballroom after WHCD shooting

    April 27, 2026
    Read More

    Supreme Court approves Texas’s congressional map redraw

    April 27, 2026
    Read More

    New Mexico Stops Abortion Reporting, Hides How Abortion Kills and Hurts Women

    April 27, 2026
    Read More
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Is Ivermectin the Key to Fighting Cancer? …. – Wellness (Dr. McCullough’s company) Sponsored Post 🛑 You can get MEBENDAZOLE  and Ivermectin from Wellness 👍

    🛑Breaking News 24/7 📰Rumble Clips👍 Choice Clips🎞️CRAZY Clips😜 Right Wing Vids🔥Military⚔️Entertainment🍿Money💵Crypto🪙Sports🏈World🌍Sci-Tech🧠 ‘Mainstream 🗞️Twitter –X🐤Lifehacks🤔 Humor Feed 🤡 Humor Daily🤡 Live Longer❤️‍🩹 Anime😊  Food🍇 US Debt Clock 💳 Support Whatfinger💲

    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Whatfinger Quickhits is published by Whatfinger News

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.