Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Trump jr. applauds Patxton’s SAVE Act offer to Cornyn
    • Justice Department releases missing Epstein files with uncorroborated Trump claims
    • Hungary clashes with EU after being shut out on Ukraine arms funding
    • President to NBC: Ground Troops to Iran “a Waste of Time”
    • JUST IN: Russia Is Providing Iran With Intelligence To Help Target US Troops and Military Assets in The Region: REPORTS
    • February Lost 92,000 Jobs, Labor Force Participation Rate Changes Little
    • Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Delivers Media Remarks
    • Jemele Hill Tells Middle America It Shouldn’t Care About Illegals
    • World News Vids
    • Whatfinger News
    • Donate
    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Subscribe
    Friday, March 6
    • Home
    • Whatfinger News
    • Breaking News 24/7
    • Rumble Fast Clips
    • Right Wing Vids
    • Daily News Link List
    • Military
    • Crazy Clips
    • Entertainment
    • Support Whatfinger
    • Donate To Whatfinger
    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Home»News»Anticipating criticism, Trump preempts claims Iran attack isn’t legal
    News

    Anticipating criticism, Trump preempts claims Iran attack isn’t legal

    Whatfinger EditorBy Whatfinger EditorMarch 1, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Following the military strikes on Iran this weekend, senior Trump administration officials informed reporters about multiple measures that were implemented to preempt not only the need for the strike, but also criticism from detractors both domestically and abroad, should it be necessitated. President Donald Trump reportedly offered Iran unlimited peaceful nuclear fuel, and was turned down, and detected that Tehran was planning a preemptive strike on Western assets before it struck this weekend. This, administration officials say, are two powerful pieces of evidence that will help the administration counter any claims that the joint offensive with Israel violated international or US law.
    Operation Epic Fury a “preemptive defensive strike”
    “The president decided he was not going to sit back and allow American forces in the region to absorb attacks from conventional missiles. We had analysis that basically told us, if we sat back and waited to get hit first, the amount of casualties and damage would be substantially higher than if we acted in a preemptive, defensive way to prevent those launches from occurring,” the official told reporters. 
    Senior U.S. administration officials described Operation Epic Fury as a preemptive defensive strike launched against Iran on Saturday to neutralize an imminent threat from Tehran’s missile arsenal, which they characterized as posing an “intolerable risk” to American forces in the region. 
    The joint U.S.-Israeli operation targeted sites in Tehran, including the compound of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, causing heavy damage and resulting in the deaths of numerous high-ranking Iranian leaders, including Khamenei. 
    Officials emphasized that intelligence indicators showed Iran was preparing to attack U.S. assets first, prompting the decision to act rather than absorb potentially higher casualties.
    Acting first was the best military option
    Negotiations with Iran had broken down after Tehran rejected a U.S. proposal to provide free nuclear fuel indefinitely in exchange for abandoning uranium enrichment, officials said. The United States had three requirements: fully dismantle their nuclear program, stop enriching uranium, and limit their ballistic missile program, all of which Iran refused. 
    The urgency for this weekend’s strikes stemmed from administration concerns that waiting for an Iranian first strike would lead to substantially greater damage and loss of life compared with proactive measures to disrupt missile launches. Three U.S. service members have been confirmed killed in action and five others were seriously wounded, according to U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). 
    Trump monitored the operations from his Mar-a-Lago property and later confirmed Khamenei’s death while offering immunity to his supporters who ceased fighting, signaling efforts to influence Iran’s internal power dynamics amid the strikes.
    War Powers act
    Trump has received criticism at home, including from Republican Party members like Kentucky’s Rep. Thomas Massie and former Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. Much of the criticism centers around a formal declaration of war required for such strikes. However, the last time that Congress formally declared war was June 1942. Since then, the United States has engaged in war in Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria. 
    President Obama authorized over 540 targeted drone strikes during his two terms, a significant increase from his predecessor, which resulted in an estimated 3,797 deaths, including over 300 civilians. These operations, primarily in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia, were often part of “Terror Tuesday” meetings where he personally approved targets. 
    The Harvard Political Review noted that “Obama authorized 54 drone strikes alone in Pakistan during his first year in office. One of the first CIA drone strikes under President Obama was at a funeral, murdering as many as 41 Pakistani civilians. The following year, Obama led 128 CIA drone strikes in Pakistan that killed at least 89 civilians. Just two years into his presidency, it was clear that the “hope” that President Obama offered during his 2008 campaign could not escape U.S. imperialism.”
    Furthermore, out of 45 U.S. presidents, 43 have ordered military strikes or actions without specific prior congressional approval or formal declaration of war. The exceptions are William Henry Harrison, who died after 31 days in office, and Zachary Taylor, who only served a little over the year and had no military engagements during his brief tenure as commander-in-chief. 


    Read Full Article: https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/trump-anticipates-criticism-preempts-claims-his-iran-attack-broke-laws?utm_source=justthenews.com&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=external-news-aggregators

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Whatfinger Editor

    Related Posts

    Justice Department releases missing Epstein files with uncorroborated Trump claims

    March 6, 2026
    Read More

    Trump jr. applauds Patxton’s SAVE Act offer to Cornyn

    March 6, 2026
    Read More

    Hungary clashes with EU after being shut out on Ukraine arms funding

    March 6, 2026
    Read More
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Is Ivermectin the Key to Fighting Cancer? …. – Wellness (Dr. McCullough’s company) Sponsored Post 🛑 You can get MEBENDAZOLE  and Ivermectin from Wellness 👍

    🛑Breaking News 24/7 📰Rumble Clips👍 Choice Clips🎞️CRAZY Clips😜 Right Wing Vids🔥Military⚔️Entertainment🍿Money💵Crypto🪙Sports🏈World🌍Sci-Tech🧠 ‘Mainstream 🗞️Twitter –X🐤Lifehacks🤔 Humor Feed 🤡 Humor Daily🤡 Live Longer❤️‍🩹 Anime😊  Food🍇 US Debt Clock 💳 Support Whatfinger💲

    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Whatfinger Quickhits is published by Whatfinger News

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.