Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Davante Adams, Sean McVay Show Frustration After Heartbreaking Rams Loss
    • Private Jet With 8 Aboard Crashes on Takeoff in Maine, FAA Says
    • Attorney General Bondi issues demands to Governor Walz over Minneapolis incident
    • Democratic push to impeach DHS Secretary Noem intensifies after fatal shooting
    • Federal officer loses finger in Minneapolis protest clash
    • Rep. Maxwell Frost reports assault at Sundance Film Festival
    • A Citizen’s Guide to Violence in Minneapolis
    • Money to ‘Decarbonize’ as Useless as Gym Memberships and Extended Warranties
    • World News Vids
    • Whatfinger News
    • Donate
    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Subscribe
    Monday, January 26
    • Home
    • Whatfinger News
    • Breaking News 24/7
    • Rumble Fast Clips
    • Right Wing Vids
    • Daily News Link List
    • Military
    • Crazy Clips
    • Entertainment
    • Support Whatfinger
    • Donate To Whatfinger
    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Home»News»You Vote: The Jack Smith hearing drew a clear line between 2 narratives for J6. What do you think?
    News

    You Vote: The Jack Smith hearing drew a clear line between 2 narratives for J6. What do you think?

    Whatfinger EditorBy Whatfinger EditorJanuary 22, 2026No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Former Special Counsel Jack Smith defended his decision to prosecute then-former President Donald Trump for his alleged unlawful retention of classified documents and alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Smith arrived on Capitol Hill on Thursday for a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee on his role as a Justice Department Special Counsel and his cases against Trump. 
    “As I testify before the Committee today, I want to be clear: I stand by my decisions as Special Counsel, including my decision to bring charges against President Trump,” Smith said in his opening statement. “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in criminal activity. 
    Smith made this defense in defiance of House Republicans, who assert Smith was primarily motivated by politics in his prosecution of the former president and Republican presidential candidate. 
    “It was always about politics and to get President Trump. They were willing to do just about anything,” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan said in his opening statement. 
    Democrats on the committee, along with Smith, claim that Trump led a hostile insurrection intended to overturn the results of the election.


    Read Full Article: https://justthenews.com/government/congress/you-vote-jack-smith-hearing-drew-clear-line-between-2-narratives-j6-what-do-you?utm_source=justthenews.com&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=external-news-aggregators

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Whatfinger Editor

    Related Posts

    Davante Adams, Sean McVay Show Frustration After Heartbreaking Rams Loss

    January 26, 2026
    Read More

    Private Jet With 8 Aboard Crashes on Takeoff in Maine, FAA Says

    January 26, 2026
    Read More

    Attorney General Bondi issues demands to Governor Walz over Minneapolis incident

    January 26, 2026
    Read More
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    • Is Ivermectin the Key to Fighting Cancer? …. – Wellness (Dr. McCullough’s company) Sponsored Post 🛑 You can get MEBENDAZOLE  and Ivermectin from Wellness 👍

    🛑Breaking News 24/7 📰Rumble Clips👍 Choice Clips🎞️CRAZY Clips😜 Right Wing Vids🔥Military⚔️Entertainment🍿Money💵Crypto🪙Sports🏈World🌍Sci-Tech🧠 ‘Mainstream 🗞️Twitter –X🐤Lifehacks🤔 Humor Feed 🤡 Humor Daily🤡 Live Longer❤️‍🩹 Anime😊  Food🍇 US Debt Clock 💳 Support Whatfinger💲

    Whatfinger News Quick Hits
    Whatfinger Quickhits is published by Whatfinger News

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.